In Re Rust
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally ■made to the Supreme Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Petitioner, being held under a commitment from the police court, seeks his release from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco. He is licensed to practice osteopathy. His license was issued March 6, 1907, under the law regulating the practice of osteopathy, passed in 1901. (Stats. 1901, p. 113.) This statute was repealed by the general Medical Act of 1907 (Stats. 1907, p. 252), and this in turn by the Medical Act of June 2, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 722), which was amended in 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 187), and in 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 93), but petitioner’s license to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Bessette v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- D'Amico v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.