Singh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
The appellant was prosecuted under an information and complaint charging him with unlawfully practicing medicine under the act of the Thirtieth Legislature.
1. Appellant by his first bill of exception raises the question of the sufficiency of the information. He complains that the complaint is insufficient because it does not contain the name of the affiant in the body thereof. The name of the affiant is at the bottom of the affidavit and was the party making the same, with the jurat of the officer taking it, and this, we think, is sufficient. Affiant was T. L. Manion and he…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Little v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Ex Parte CollinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. FifeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Davis v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Ex parte ClinnardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Milling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.