McNaughton v. Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA., The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This case was submitted with Crane v. Johnson, ante, 339. It was considered in the District Court with that case, three judges sitting as in that case. It comes here on appeal from an order denying an interlocutory injunction. The court entertained jurisdiction upon the authority of Raich v. Truax, 219 Fed. Rep. 273, 283; Truax v. Raich, 239 U. S. 33.
The court in denying the injunction said “that the granting of such orders is within the sound discretion of the court, and in the exercise of such discretion, based upon the averments of the bills, we are of opinion that the application should…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Nellie Woods, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John N. Woods v. Holy Cross HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Ex Parte HalstedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.