Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Halsted

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1944No. 22775PublishedCited by 65 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

By "Chapter 359, Acts 1943, Regular Session, 48th Legislature, appearing as Arts. 4512a — 1 to 4512a — 18, Vernon’s Annotated Revised Civil Statutes, known as the “Chiropractic Act,” and hereinafter referred to as the “Act;” the legislature set up, recognized, and defined, as an independent field of endeavor, the Science of Chiropractic, and prescribed rules and regulations governing the practice thereof, in this State. Among the offenses created in the Act, it is unlawful for anyone: (1) to practice chiropractic without a license; (b) to advertise as a chiropractor without…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. McNaughton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Greenwell v. COURT OF APP. THIRTEENTH JUD. DIST.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Holberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API