Blumberg v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
This is a conviction for practicing optometry without having first registered, as required by law, the license to so practice; the punishment, a fine of $250.00.
Optometry and its practice in this State is defined and regulated in both our civil and criminal statutes. The civil features are embraced in Chapter 10, being Arts. 4552-4566, R. C. S., while the criminal features appear in Chapter 5, being Arts. 735-738, P. C. It may be said that the criminal statutes are divided into three primary subdivisions: (a) defining optometry; (b) requiring, as a condition precedent to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNaughton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Allison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Posey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- McKnight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.