Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State Board of Naturopathic Examiners

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1957No. 10447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES,' Justice.

The facts of this case are stated in the pleadings and are agreed to be correct.

The sole question of law presented is the constitutionality, vel non, of Article 4590d, 1 V.A.C.S., known as the Naturo-pathic Act.

This suit for declaratory judgment was against the Attorney General and Comptroller of the State of Texas and was brought by persons alleging themselves to be members of the State Board of Naturo-pathic Examiners on behalf of such Board, for themselves individually and on behalf of 450 other persons alleged to be licensed to practice naturopathy in this State. The only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HalstedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Ex Parte SlaughterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schlichting v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wilson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Charles D. Stuart v. Will Wilson, Attorney General of the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Herold v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API