Gray v. Yarbrough
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. George H. Thompson, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The controversy between the parties arose out of the following contract, executed on the day it bears date:
“Sacramento, Cal. Aug. 27, 1917.
“It is hereby agreed this day by and between Harry J. Gray, owner of two quarter sections of land near Lincoln, California and P. L. Yarbrough, agent, that in consideration of the sum of $300.00 cash in hand paid by said Yarbrough to said Gray, the receipt "whereof is hereby acknowledged, that said Gray will have assigned and deliver to said Yarbrough one certain promissory note given by said Yarbrough to Harry T. Fuller.
“And furthermore it is agreed by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Original Mining & Milling Co. v. CasadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.