Legal Opinion

Calmon v. Sarraille

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1904No. S.F. No. 3702PublishedCited by 54 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

Action to set aside a deed. Judgitient was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and from this judgment and an order denying a new trial the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiffs employed Frederic Gamier to negotiate for them with Josephine Beyersdorff, who was the owner of a certain lot of land in San Francisco, for its purchase. As a result of his negotiations he obtained her offer to sell the same for the sum of $11,500. The plaintiffs were at that time the owners of another lot of land in San Francisco of the value of $1,150. After Gamier had received this offer he represented…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. King v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API