Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Mullaney

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1943No. Civ. 13692PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff instituted this action to obtain an accounting from her brother, George J. Mullaney, hereinafter referred to as “the defendant.” Also joined as a defendant was her sister, Marie Mullaney, sued as such because of her refusal to join as plaintiff. A prolonged trial resulted in the entry of findings and judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant George J. Mullaney, requiring said defendant to pay to plaintiff the sum of $14,887.04, together with interest, and certain alternative judgments for recovery of Exeter Oil Company and Mt. Diablo Oil Company stock or the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Vista v. Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API