Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court dismissed by summary judgment appellant Martin Kersten’s claim that respondent Minnesota Mutual breached its insurance contract when it discontinued payment of disability benefits. Appellant challenges (a) the legal conclusion that his psychological disability is an excluded preexisting condition; and (b) the conclusion on the facts that he failed to prove his disability still existed when disability benefits were terminated.
We reverse and remand for trial proceedings on disputed evidentiary issues.
FACTS
In September 1985, appellant purchased a disability…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Peterson v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000