Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Scottsdale Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 12, 2006No. CIV.04-4704 (RHK/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs timely Objections to the December 14, 2005 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson. Judge Erickson has recommended that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and Plaintiffs’ denied. The undersigned has reviewed de novo the recommendations of Judge Erickson and the Objections interposed by Plaintiffs. That review demonstrates that Judge Erickson’s thorough and well reasoned analysis of the issues presented to him is fully supported by controlling legal precedent and should be adopted in all…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Barbara McLaughlin v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Ronald J. Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf of TheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re McNeilus Manufacturing Explosion Coordinated LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- In re McNeilus Manufacturing Explosion Coordinated LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019