Legal Opinion

Balder v. Haley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1987No. C7-85-1259PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal from the court of appeals’ decision to reverse a Benton County District Court’s judgment based on a jury verdict that appellant Honeywell was not responsible through negligence for respondent Michael Balder’s injury in the explosion of a liquid propane water heater. Though sustaining the jury’s findings that Honeywell had not negligently designed a particular gas valve implicated in the accident, the court of appeals held sua sponte that evidence conclusively demonstrated that Honeywell had breached its duty to warn of dangers associated with the malfunction…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Lamke v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Lovick v. Wil-RichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API