Legal Opinion

State, by Lord v. Bradac

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1960No. 37,655PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from judgment of the district court in a condemnation proceeding.

*468The proceeding involves the taking of certain property of the appellants. The commissioners awarded $2,050 for parcel 16, which was taken in 1952, and awarded $456 for parcel 216, which was taken in 1955. On appeal to the district court the jury returned a verdict of $1,250 for parcel 16, and $675 for parcel 216. Appellant Frank S. Bradac represented himself in the district court as attorney pro se. During the course of the trial and subsequently, no exceptions were taken to the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HigginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Kedrowski v. CzechSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. STATE, BY LORD v. ShirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Wozniak v. LutaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Kilty v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Wright v. M. B. Hagen Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API