Kedrowski v. Czech
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages to his person and his automobile arising out of a collision between defendants’ car and that of the plaintiff. The defendants counterclaimed for car damages. At the close of the testimony, defendants moved for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and therefore not entitled to recover. The motion was denied by the trial court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $7,143. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendants appeal from the judgment.
Viewing the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Wojtowicz v. BeldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Newcomb v. MeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Larson v. MontpetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.