Legal Opinion

Kedrowski v. Czech

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1955No. 36,457PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages to his person and his automobile arising out of a collision between defendants’ car and that of the plaintiff. The defendants counterclaimed for car damages. At the close of the testimony, defendants moved for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and therefore not entitled to recover. The motion was denied by the trial court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $7,143. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendants appeal from the judgment.

Viewing the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Wojtowicz v. BeldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Newcomb v. MeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Larson v. MontpetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API