Wright v. M. B. Hagen Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
This action is brought by a real estate agent to recover commissions allegedly due on a lease-option agreement and to establish the percentage rate for future commissions under that agreement. The jury verdict permitted plaintiff to recover on the commissions claimed to be due but failed to establish the percentage rate for future commissions. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. We remand with instructions.
Some detailed facts are essential. Charles W. Wright, plaintiff-appellant, became employed as a real estate salesman in 1964 by defendant, a firm engaged in business as real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Majerus v. GuelsowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Kedrowski v. CzechSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Thomson & Kelly Co. v. United States Merchants & Shippers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Nelson v. the Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Phelan v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Kelly v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Real Estate Dynamics, Inc. v. GenzlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004