Legal Opinion
State v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1961No. 38,072PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The State of Minnesota by its attorney general commenced this condemnation proceeding against the Coffman Realty Company and several other respondents to acquire certain lands for trunk highway purposes. Court-appointed commissioners filed a report awarding damages of $32,500 to said company, and appeals were taken therefrom to the district court both by the state and the company.
After a trial and a jury verdict of $13,000, the company moved for a new trial upon the following grounds:
“1. The Court erred in allowing the petitioner to cross-examine the Court appointed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Malmquist v. LeedsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- City of Tucson v. LaForgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- In RE CONDEMNATION BY OAK CENTER CREAMERY CO. v. GrobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.