Legal Opinion

Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1956No. 36,581PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

This is a suit against the maker of a promissory note by the plaintiffs, who contend that they are holders in due course and that as such are not subject to the defense of a partial failure of consideration. On July 31, 1951, defendant, Litchfield Wood-Working Com pany, Inc., executed a promissory note for $3,700, payable 30 days after date, and delivered it to the Midland Lumber & Supply Company of Minneapolis in part payment for lumber obtained by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. O'Keefe v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. In Re Estate of MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Maras v. StilinovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API