Legal Opinion
State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 1989No. C4-89-1082PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s award of just compensation for the taking of 13 outdoor advertising structures pursuant to the Minnesota Outdoor Advertising Control Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 173 (1988). Appellant contends that the trial court erred in awarding compensation for lost rental income using a gross rent or gross annual multiplier. Appellant maintains that the method of valuation dictated by the common law of eminent domain is the cost approach. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1965, Congress passed the Federal Highway Beautification Act which authorized the taking of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- County of Ramsey v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vivid, Inc. v. FiedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- LaMar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. Heavy Constructors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Wichita v. DentonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Nat'l Adv. Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.