Legal Opinion

Kilty v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1970No. 41982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court.

This action was brought to recover certain medical expenses under a health and accident policy issued by defendant insurance company. Defendant claimed nonliability on the ground that the policy had been rescinded by mutual consent. The trial court instructed the jury that the alleged rescission was void and of no effect if secured by the insurer in bad faith or if induced by any misrepresentation on the part of the insurer. A verdict was returned for plaintiff in the amount of $3,499.58. The trial court entered brief findings of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kedrowski v. CzechSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Peterson v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Merchants & Farmers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Nelson v. the Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pruco Life Insurance Company v. Wilmington Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Johnsrud v. Tri-State Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Pitner v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Westgor v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Wright v. M. B. Hagen Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API