Clemens v. Gregg
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The statement of the case by appellants and respondents in their respective briefs does not differ materially. We have followed that of the respondents mainly.
On April 13, 1909, the plaintiff herein brought suit against Wellington Gregg, Jr., as trustee, under a trust deed made to secure certain notes of the Keane-Wonder Company given to the Francis Mohawk Company and James F. Peck, to enjoin a sale of the property therein described under an advertisement in execution of the power of sale contained in such trust deed, and for an accounting for moneys received and paid on account of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Englund v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morr v. CrouchOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Church v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Coolsaet v. City of VeblenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. TurlokMontana Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.