Legal Opinion

Smith v. Whittier

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1892No. Nos. 13833, 14453PublishedCited by 122 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court in this case, and in the case of Treadwell v. Whittier, 80 Cal. 574.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the falling of an elevator. The facts out of which the cause of action arose are the same as those which were presented in the case of Treadwell against the same defendants, reported in 80 Cal. 574, the plaintiff and Treadwell having both been passengers on the elevator at the time of the accident. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $30,000, and from the judgment entered thereon, and also from the order of the court denying a new trial, the defendants have appealed to this court.

1. The case of Treadwell was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. West v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. ErvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API