Legal Opinion

Morr v. Crouch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1969No. 68-563PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

In oral argument, appellants abjured any contention that the landowner’s husband, who was present at the conference when the settlement entry was prepared and who is now the real party in interest, should be estopped to deny the validity of the settlement entry.

The position of appellants is that the “journal entry —settlement” conveyed title to appellee’s land to the state of Ohio; and is based upon two arguments: First, that the signature of landowner’s attorney on the “journal entry— settlement” was binding on the landowner; and second, that even if the attorney did not have authority to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Sponseller v. Sponseller.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Clemens v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Shilling v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Tedrich Furniture Co. v. TisdaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morris v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Garrison v. Daytonian HotelOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SessleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API