Newman v. Los Angeles Transit Lines
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment based upon a unanimous verdict rejecting her suit for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. She asserts that the “judgment was obtained by fraud, perjury on the part of the defendant and each and every one of its witnesses concealing evidence from the court and jury producing a substitute operator instead of the actual true operator.” She follows such assertion with her assignments of error and arguments thereon which will be treated in the same order in the following discussion.
The accident which caused plaintiff’s injuries occurred according to the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Yolo Water & Power Co. v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Gjurich v. FiegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.