State v. Turlok
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the defendant showing that he has not been brought to trial within six months after the filing of the information and that the delay of the cause has not been caused by his application, the burden then devolves on the state to show good cause for not bringing the defendant to trial within the time prescribed by statute. (Von Feldstein v. State, 17 Ariz. 245,150 P. 235; State v. Dewey, 13 Kan. 735, 88 P. 881;Yule v. State, 16 Ariz. 134, 141 P. 571; State v. Kuhn,154 Ind. 450, 57 N.E. 106; State v. Bateham, 94 Or. 524, 86 P. page 5; State v. Arkle, 76 Mont. 81, 245 P. 526.) Want of time or…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. EarnestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Slade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Lockhead v. WeinsteinMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Pueblo v. Vargas RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.