Legal Opinion

State v. Turlok

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1926No. 5,932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the defendant showing that he has not been brought to trial within six months after the filing of the information and that the delay of the cause has not been caused by his application, the burden then devolves on the state to show good cause for not bringing the defendant to trial within the time prescribed by statute. (Von Feldstein v. State, 17 Ariz. 245,150 P. 235; State v. Dewey, 13 Kan. 735, 88 P. 881;Yule v. State, 16 Ariz. 134, 141 P. 571; State v. Kuhn,154 Ind. 450, 57 N.E. 106; State v. Bateham, 94 Or. 524, 86 P. page 5; State v. Arkle, 76 Mont. 81, 245 P. 526.) Want of time or…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. EarnestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Slade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Lockhead v. WeinsteinMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Pueblo v. Vargas RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API