Riddle v. Artis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.
Does it affirmatively appear upon the face of the complaint, as contended by the defendants Morris, that the negligence alleged against them by the plaintiff was superseded and completely insulated by the intervening negligence of the defendant Artis? We think not. This works a reversal of the judgment below.
It is elemental that there may be two or more proximate causes of an injury. These may originate from separate and distinct sources or agencies operating independently of each other; yet if they join and concur in producing the result complained of, the author of each cause may be held…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Beach v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.