Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1968No. 464PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Appellant contends the trial judge erred in denying his motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Defendants Edwin B. Hill, Administrator of Thomas Franklin Bryan, Sr., and Jacqueline Hill, Administratrix of the estate of Dorothy McKinley Bryan, plaintiff Yirgie Bowman Spach, admin-istratrix of Samuel Eli Spach, Sr., and plaintiffs Virgie Bowman Spach, Samuel Eli Spach, Jr., and Scottie Jo Bowman (hereinafter called appellees) by their respective complaints and counterclaims allege, inter alia, that appellant Reeves violated the provisions of G.S. 20-148 and G.S. 20-146, in that he failed to pass to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Hobbs v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. MemsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Quick v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API