Legal Opinion

Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. Hasty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1954No. 597PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BaeNhixl, O. J.

After the pleadings were filed, the plaintiff sought and obtained leave to examine both defendants prior to trial as provided by General Statutes ch. 1, art. 46. The defendant Burns, at the time the examination was had and in the trial below, moved to suppress the examination of Hasty for the reason that “the application therefor sets out no facts specifying the information sought or the purpose therefor,” and “that the Clerk making the order for the examination found no such facts.” The motion was overruled, and the plaintiff offered said examination in evidence as against…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Cowan v. Murrows Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API