Huber v. Knock, C-080071 (11-14-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} This case presents the question whether the trial court properly reformed a deed, and whether that deed could be enforced against a third party.
Jack Knock Sells to the Ruehmers and to the Hubers
{¶ 2} Jack Knock had owned several hundred acres of land. In September 2003, Helen Ruehmer purchased 36 acres of this land from Knock. Daniel and Teresa Huber also purchased some of Knock's property — one parcel in 1992 and another in October 2003. An old farm road ran over some of the Hubers' second parcel and continued toward Helen Ruehmer's land. In the deed conveying the 36 acres…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Tiller v. HintonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Frate v. RimenikOhio Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. MoweryOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Nat'l City Real Estate Servs. LLC v. Frazier, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County2018
- Schlabach v. KondikOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Huntington Natl. Bank v. BetteleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. TalliereOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.