Legal Opinion

Tiller v. Hinton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. 84-1702PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The present case involves essentially a single issue: Whether there exists an easement, either express or implied of necessity, so as to provide a way of ingress and egress for appellants across the adjacent property purchased by the appellee. We hold that an easement does not exist and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

It has long been the law in this state that “* * * all interests in land shall be transferred by written instrument, * * * and that such instruments shall be fraudulent as against a bona fide purchaser without notice unless recorded pursuant to Section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trattar v. RauschOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Renner v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Village of Hyde Park v. DyerHamilton County Court of Insolvency · 1908

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Emrick v. Multicon Builders, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cadwallader v. ScovannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Thames v. Asia's Janitorial Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Fitzpatrick v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API