Frate v. Rimenik
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDat, J.
This controversy involves four paramount questions, to-wit: (1) Was there clear and convincing proof of a mutual mistake between the parties to the deed from the Frates to Rimenik and Mendluwitz? (2) Was the deed from the Frates to the Fazios tantamount to a conveyance of that which the Frates had theretofore conveyed, and was such transaction so permeated with fraud, in contemplation of law, as to justify its - being held void? (3) Had the statute of limitations run in favor of G-iovannine Fazio at the time she was made party to this action? (4) Was there error in the Court of'Appeals…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Smith v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
3Cited by29 opinions
- Henkle v. HenkleOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Atkins v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Cooper v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Ayres v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.