Comer v. Risko
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} The narrow issue before us is whether, within the constraints of Clark v. Southview Hosp. & Family Health Ctr. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 435, 628 N.E.2d 46, a viable claim exists against a hospital under a theory of agency by estoppel for the negligence of an independent-contractor physician when the physician cannot be made a party because the statute of limitations has expired.
{¶ 2} We hold that agency by estoppel is a derivative claim of vicarious liability whereby the liability of the hospital must flow through the independent-contractor physician. Consequently, there can be no viable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Albain v. Flower HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by302 opinions
- Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio Government Risk Management Plan v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Smith v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.