Legal Opinion

Felgenhauer v. Soni

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 2004No. B157490PublishedCited by 13 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we hold that to establish a claim of right to a prescriptive easement, the claimant need not believe he or she is legally entitled to use of the easement.

Jerry and Kim Felgenhauer brought this action to quiet title to prescriptive easements over neighboring property owned by Ken and Jennifer Soni. [[/]]*

A jury made special findings that established a prescriptive easement for deliveries. [[/]] *

We affirm.

FACTS

In November of 1971, the Felgenhauers purchased a parcel of property consisting of the front portion of two contiguous lots on Spring Street in Paso Robles. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Myran v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Lord v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. McBride v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Aaron v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Cobb v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API