Legal Opinion

Cobb v. City of Stockton

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2011No. C062328PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*67Opinion

HULL, J.

Nine years after the City of Stockton (City) initiated eminent domain proceedings to acquire real property owned by Andrew C. Cobb, as trustee of the Andrew C. Cobb 1992 Revocable Trust (the Trust), and after the City constructed a public roadway across the condemned property, the trial court dismissed the action for lack of prosecution (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.360). Plaintiff, Michael A. Cobb, as successor trustee, then initiated this action in inverse condemnation to collect for the taking of the property by virtue of the extant roadway.

The City demurred to the complaint,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Douglas v. West Bay Sanitary Dist. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API