Taormino v. Denny
California Supreme Court
Steel & Arostegui and Robert W. Steel for Plaintiff and Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TRAYNOR, C. J.
Plaintiff brought this proceeding for an injunction and to quiet her title to a road over which defendant claimed both an easement by prescription and a right to pass by virtue of an implied dedication to the public. On September 19, 1966, the court entered judgment for plaintiff quieting her title to the road and enjoining any occupancy or trespass by defendant.
The court found that the road had existed on plaintiff’s property since 1910 or before, that defendant had frequently used the road without plaintiff’s consent and claimed an interest in the road adverse to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- United Pacific Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.