Legal Opinion
Lord v. Sanchez
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1955No. Civ. 16443PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Defendants Anthony and Dolores Sanchez own a parcel of land which fronts upon a highway. Plaintiffs acquired by grant an easement 20 feet wide across the Sanchez parcel as a means of access to their adjoining and nearby lands but they use a roadway which embraces only 3 feet of that easement and includes an adjoining strip 15 feet wide.
The court found that the plaintiffs acquired an easement in the 20-foot strip by grant and in the 15-foot strip by prescription; concluded that plaintiffs have an easement for ingress and egress across said 35-foot right of way; and quieted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Corea v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Orr v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Felgenhauer v. SoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cleary v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Gaut v. FarmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.