Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
2DissentSeawell, J.
This is a proceeding for compensation, under the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act, for an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant, Palmer-Bee Company, on 15 June, 1944. The defendant Royal Indemnity Company was the insurance carrier of its codefendant at the time of the accident.
The plaintiff, Mack Whitted, hereinafter called "claimant," was employed as a machine setter. On the above date, while setting up a machine on the premises…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by32 opinions
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Ashley v. Rent-A-Car CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.