Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partConnor, J.

Petition by plaintiff for an award under the Workmen's Compensation Act on account of the death of his intestate arising out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant.

It was admitted that the deceased, Curtis Hanks, was at the time of his injury and death, on 6 December, 1929, in the employ of defendant, and that the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act apply. The claim for an award is resisted, however, on the ground that plaintiff elected to pursue his remedy by original action in the Superior Court of Wilkes County (where plaintiff resided), under the Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butts v. . Montague Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. In Re HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Phifer v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Lawrence v. . BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Bye v. Interstate Granite Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API