Legal Opinion

Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1942PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, employee, brings this action under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, against the employer and insurance carrier, to obtain compensation for injuries.

The Industrial Commission, in addition to jurisdictional determinations, made the following pertinent findings of fact:

1. The plaintiff, as the result of his injury by accident on 21 December, 1939, has sustained the complete loss of his left leg, and 50 per cent permanent disability or loss of the use of his right foot, which said disability includes the loss of his great toe and three other toes on his right foot.

2.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. International Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Matter of Sweeting v. . American Knife Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Lassiter v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. New York Cent. R. Co. v. Bianc. American Knife Co. v. Sweeting. Clark Knitting Co., Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API