Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Lowdermilk
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 2, 1951No. 676PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNT, J.
The defendants seriously contend the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that the plaintiff is disabled, and, if so, that such disability is the result of the accident of 26 March, 1948.
It is true the plaintiff has been examined and re-examined by a number of medical experts, and they are unable to find any definite and conclusive cause for the plaintiff’s condition. But in the original agreement for compensation, these defendants agreed that plaintiff’s disability resulted from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, and his complaint then with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Buchanan v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- McAninch v. Buncombe County SchoolsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.