Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Rent-A-Car Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 24, 1967No. 768PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Defendants contend there is not sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of fact and to justify the conclusions of law that the operative procedures now recommended by claimant’s physicians or that the nursing and medical care received by claimant after 12 June 1963 tend to lessen claimant’s period of disability so as to impose liability for the payment thereof on defendants.

G.S. 97-25 provides, inter alia: “Medical, surgical, hospital, nursing services, medicines, sick travel, and other treatment including medical and surgical supplies as may reasonably be required, for a period…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Barnhardt v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Radica v. Carolina MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Watson v. Winston-Salem Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API