Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
We herewith adopt as a part of our opinion the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, by Pullen, P. J., except that portion which holds that the judgment is not excessive. The question of excessive damages is disposed of by our views, which immediately follow the adopted portions of the District Court of Appeal opinion. The opinion of the District 'Court of Appeal follows first in order:
“Respondent herein as plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $62,500 based upon a verdict by a jury in that amount against San Joaquin Cotton Oil Company, a corporation, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Schiller v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.