Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Company v. Arguello

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1963No. 3054PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

One of the defendants in this case, Ford Motor Company, has appealed from an adverse verdict and judgment in the District Court of Uinta County. Suit had been brought against Harold Peterson and Ford by Manuel Arguello, plaintiff, who was seriously injured while riding as a guest in a Ford automobile owned and driven by Peterson. The judgment was against both defendants and in the amount of $103,000.

The contentions made by Ford, on appeal, are these:

1. The courts of Wyoming have no jurisdiction over Ford Motor Company.

2. The evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the accident was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rocky Mountain Trucking Co. v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Borzea v. AnselmiWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Culver v. SekulichWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Davis v. HollowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API