Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Woodbury

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1890No. 234PublishedCited by 165 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

Early in the evening of December 6,1881, the defendant in error, while passing on the sidewalk near the north entrance of the Biggs House on G Street, in the city of Washington, fell into a hole, whereby he sustained personal injuries of a serious charactei’. Claiming that the sidewalk was. not in a safe condition for use by the public, and that the District authorities had been grossly negligent in not keeping it in proper repair, he brought this action to recover damages for-such injuries. The plea was not guilty. A verdict for fifteen thousand dollars was returned against the.District, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API