Legal Opinion

Schiller v. Rice

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1952No. A-3328PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

Based upon answers of the jury to certain of fifty-eight special issues, Mrs. Less Schiller and Miss Mozelle King, whose rights are largely governed by the provisions of Article 6701b, V.A.C.S., the guest statute, and its proper interpretation, each recovered judgment in the trial court of damages for personal injuries against Paul Rice. On appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas Rice assigned sixty-six points of error, sixty-three of which were overruled by that Court, two of which were sustained and one of which was left undecided. Having concluded that the trial court erred in two…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Houston National Bank v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wood v. Kane Boiler Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bowman v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API