Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. Lacy
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Clay County. The opinion gives a history of the litigation and a statement of the matters in contention. j
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
Eddy and Cross were the receivers of the Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Company, operating the same under appointment by the United States Circuit Court. On the 15th day of June, 1890, Mollie M. Lacy was a passenger on a passenger train of the said receivers, and there was a collision between the passenger train and a special train at Nocona, in which Mollie M. Lacy claims to have received personal injuries. John B. Lacy, the husband of Mollie M. Lacy, filed suit in the District Court of Clay County against the receivers and the railway company for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LehmbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- L. N. Brunswig & Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- International & G. N. R. R. v. KindredTexas Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- McIver v. GloriaTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. MotwillerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Hoekstra v. HelgelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.