Legal Opinion

City of Statesville v. Cloaninger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1992No. 9122SC114PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The City argues 15 issues on appeal. For the reasons below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

First the City contends that the trial court erred in denying its request for the following jury instruction:

Members of the jury though the compensation you award today represents all the compensation the defendants will receive for the easement rights being acquired in this action the law of this state recognizes that once a flight easement has been established, further compensable takings may occur upon increases in operations within the easement acquired with consequent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grace E. Avery v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Albrecht v. DorsettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. In Re the Appeal of OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Broadbent v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API