North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. Black
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
We deem it necessary to take specific note of only four of the twenty-eight exceptions of the petitioner to rulings of the trial judge admitting, excluding, striking out, or refusing to strike out, evidence.
Exception 18 covers the admission of the simple statement of George Hedrick, a witness for the respondents, that he had “a bunch of cattle . . . and five springs” on his farm, and that he “valued” his springs. It is apparent that the receipt of this simple statement could not have influenced the jury in the decision of the ease. In consequence, its admission must be adjudged harmless to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Hodges v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Old Colony Railroad v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Dean v. Carolina Coach Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Ferrell v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.