Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1941No. 30931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Defendant is a. public corporation, organized under the provisions of sections 70-701 to 70-719, Comp. St. Supp. 1939. Among other things, it has power to make appropriation of public waters, to borrow money, to construct, own and operate irrigation works, to sell water to those landowners within the area served by its distribution system, to charge a “nondiscriminatory” rate for the same, and to use and pledge its revenues for the payment of its debts. It has no power of taxation. Its relations with the landowners, who are its potential customers for water, is one of contract of sale and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska R. R. v. WiebeNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Stull v. Department of Roads & IrrigationNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Riddle v. Lodi Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Stocker v. Nemaha Valley Drainage District No. 2Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sweeney v. PrestonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pueblo v. García Chavez del ValleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  4. Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Kennedy v. Department of Roads & IrrigationNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API