Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
The issue is whether, in a condemnation action, the jury may consider quantified lost business profits in determining the fair market value of the land on which the business is located. Applying our well-*3established case law, we hold it may not, and accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and order a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND
To safely accommodate increased traffic and promote public safety, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“DOT”) proposed improvements at the intersection of Garrett Road and Durham-Chapel Hill Road in Durham County. When DOT and landowner M.M.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- United Community Bank (Georgia) v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. Western Pocahontas Properties, L.P.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- Rowlette v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.