Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 2006No. 305PA05PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

The issue is whether, in a condemnation action, the jury may consider quantified lost business profits in determining the fair market value of the land on which the business is located. Applying our well-*3established case law, we hold it may not, and accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and order a new trial.

I. BACKGROUND

To safely accommodate increased traffic and promote public safety, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“DOT”) proposed improvements at the intersection of Garrett Road and Durham-Chapel Hill Road in Durham County. When DOT and landowner M.M.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. United Community Bank (Georgia) v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. Western Pocahontas Properties, L.P.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rowlette v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API