Smith v. King Creek Grazing Ass'n
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
The question presented is whether the owners of a farm are entitled to relief from the flooding of their fields by water originating in a spring located on higher property. The farmers, Delmo and Mada Smith, brought this action when King Creek Grazing Association improved and developed a spring on its higher ground. King Creek used the augmented supply of spring water for consumption by its cattle. During the autumn and winter, water not used by King Creek was discharged into a natural channel which crossed other properties and led to the Smiths’ farm. This channel always had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Weinberg v. Northern Alaska Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Merrill v. PenrodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Roberts v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990